From: Grant Hutchinson (grant_at_splorp.com)
Date: Thu Jul 14 2005 - 07:39:43 PDT
On Jul 12, 2005, at 6:10 AM, Goodwin, Greg P. wrote:
> Well that sucks! My DOS based seti has been pinging at the
> server for days now. So is this more efficient than the last version?
In my opinion, no.
BOINC supoorts fewer platforms, is immensely more complex to install
and navigate, and quite frankly confused the hell out of me - and I've
been chugging through Seti units since 1999. By the way, they haven't
eliminated the 'classic' version of Seti - they've only turned off the
ability to create new 'classic' accounts. for the time being, I'm still
going to use the old version.
The Seti Classic site is now here:
http://seticlassic.ssl.berkeley.edu/
The Seti Classic Newtons4Ever team page is here (but is not current):
http://setiathome2.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_36831.html
g.
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 14 2005 - 08:00:02 PDT