From: Goodwin, Greg P. (GoodwinG_at_aafes.com)
Date: Thu Jul 14 2005 - 07:52:56 PDT
Oh good.. the classic account does still work, and quite
frankly, I like the all text, quick no pretty graphics version. So I
will stick with that too.
[mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net] On Behalf Of Grant Hutchinson
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Seti at home
On Jul 12, 2005, at 6:10 AM, Goodwin, Greg P. wrote:
> Well that sucks! My DOS based seti has been pinging at the
> server for days now. So is this more efficient than the last version?
In my opinion, no.
BOINC supoorts fewer platforms, is immensely more complex to install=20
and navigate, and quite frankly confused the hell out of me - and I've=20
been chugging through Seti units since 1999. By the way, they haven't=20
eliminated the 'classic' version of Seti - they've only turned off the=20
ability to create new 'classic' accounts. for the time being, I'm still=20
going to use the old version.
The Seti Classic site is now here:
The Seti Classic Newtons4Ever team page is here (but is not current):
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles:
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 14 2005 - 08:30:00 PDT