From: Joost van de Griek (jvdg_at_jvdg.com)
Date: Thu Mar 31 2005 - 08:34:33 PST
On 2005-03-31 11:48, James Nichols wrote:
> The guy claims that it's HWR was based on the Newton, and that it was
> "faster" because it started out with roughly 150k words and ran on an
> 68040 making it faster than the newtons. Well, the 68040s in that era
> ranged from what, 25mhz to 66mhz? I highly doubt that this thing would
> outperform a mp2x00 machine for HWR speed.
Might also be based on the Duo 2300C: 100 MHz PowerPC 603e. Considering that
the Newtons in the Duo's time were all based on 20 MHz ARM610's (MP1x0), he
may well have a point.
,xtG
.tsooJ
-- Be sure not to program a "Kill Everyone in the Room" option into it. Far too many people make that mistake when programming their robots. -- Joost van de Griek <http://www.jvdg.net/> -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 31 2005 - 09:00:01 PST