-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 18, 2006, at 03.48, Andrew Smallshaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:17:07PM -0500, Matthew Atkinson wrote:
[snip]
>
> I don't see why not, though bear in mind that the current
> requirements are
> going to be far higher than a memory card with a corresponding
> effect on
> battery life.
Well, is that entirely true? I mean, newer storage devices are often
pretty power efficient. If 512 MB SD cards consumed 16x more power
than 32 MB SD cards, then there would be a lot of unhappy digital
camera, MP3 player, and PDA owners out there. True, as a hard disk,
it WILL consume more, but is it really going to have that HUGE of an
effect (>10% for example) on battery life?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEvRzPh/R/wkI6oPQRAgkIAJ93tBwNFjuEppsf352uJupHzb7ObwCgnujq
O5Wvdvc1YAIUGR5HijM9vHs=
=VHLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/Received on Tue Jul 18 13:39:31 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 18 2006 - 16:30:00 EDT