Jon Glass wrote:
> On 3/10/06, andy bloom <andybloom@mac.com> wrote:
>
>>Would some be so kind as to list, in practical rather than technical
>>terms, what I won't be able to do on my new MP2000 that would be
>>capable on the MP2100? Will GPS and Bluetooth be as effective? Will
>>it be slower? Muchothanks in advance... andybloom
>
>
> Does not the 2k have less heap than the 130? It would seem to me that you
> can do hardly anything on the 2000, including web or any heap-intensive
> activities. I would not recommend a 2000 over a 2100, especially for what
> you want to do. I suppose people have acheived these things, but what a
> pain! I'm sure you will spend much time freezing and unfreezing apps just to
> do simple things like email, so I wouldn't bother, unless you have one app
> you really want to run (mp3, or email, or web, but not on the same device)
now, now, now the 2000 is not that bad, i used one from the time they
came out until the 2100 came out and it was very usable. untill i got a
2100 in my hands THEN i was spoiled, MUCH faster feel in the UI.
william
-- special knowledge can be a terrible disadvantage if it leads you too far along a path that you cannot explain anymore. mentat admonition -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/Received on Fri Mar 10 07:28:22 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 10 2006 - 08:30:00 EST