Re: [NTLK] the FAQ?

I agree with keeping the historical, and I would suggest it be
labeled as such (so as not to confuse the noobs, as I are 1).

I would be happy to work on a chunk, but am not smart enough to
decide how to chunkify the whole project...

On 14. Oct, 2006, at 17:11, Grant Hutchinson wrote:

> One thing that should *not* happen, is deletion of any information
> in the current version. If a new
> link can replace on dead link (for instance: point to an archived
> copy of a page in the Internet
> Archive) then we should do that, rather than completed deleted a
> section in the FAQ. Likewise, a new
> link to a related section of the Wiki should be added to the
> existing information, rather than
> replacing it.
>
> Does this make sense?
>
>> I'll volunteer to do this if nobody else wants to, or we can divvy up
>> the work amongst a few people.
>
> Speaking of divvying up...
>
> What are the chances that we could get seven (or so) individuals to
> each take on one of the sections
> to maintain or update?

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/