On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:15 AM, <dograt@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Can you imagine how superlative the Newton might have been by now had
> development continued? Would it have looked an iPhone?
I think quite the opposite--I think it would look just like the
Palm--outdated, and on its last legs. It was already creaking--pushed
to the extremes internally, when Jobs killed it. I _know_ there used
to be an interview with a Newton engineer on the web (but I can't find
it any more), in which he described the hacked-up, patched-together
internals of the Newton OS, and how it would have required a complete
rewrite to make it work with more modenrn technologies--example--look
at the NIE stack. IT's slow and awkward. The fact that we, today have
such things as wifi, bluetooth and even ATA access is more a testimony
to the genious of some people _despite_ the OS, not of the OS's
strengths.
I believe that the Newton had to go--but the way it went was not
necessary, IMO, and the financial hurt it caused many, many people is
not easily overlooked/ignored/forgotten.
-- -Jon Glass Krakow, Poland <jonglass@usa.net> "I don't believe in philosophies. I believe in fundamentals." --Jack Nicklaus ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Fri Feb 29 02:40:57 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 29 2008 - 11:30:00 EST