On 17-Jan-08, at 4:43 AM, Lord Groundhog wrote:
> Norman,
>
> For better or worse, it seems to me your response to the Air makes
> the most
> sense out of what otherwise is a mystifying set of missing technology
> options and the resultant missed opportunity to release a killer
> laptop.
This is not my thinking. Someone else wrote it. I just happen to
think in many respects this seems to make more sense than any other
reasons / rationale's I could think of for a machine like the Air.
> I have to take issue with one thing you said. "Computer users
> don't open
> the case. It's more the way people relate to phones or a disposable
> lighters. It works or it doesn't. When it stops working, you
> throw it away
> and get another one." Errrr, no thanks. For the price of an Air,
> I want
> "tweaking rights".
I'd tend to agree :)
Right now the Air is a damn expensive Bic lighter.
When laptops get to be 1.99 maybe I'd just toss it and get another.
> Part of the genius of my Pismo is how easy it is to get
> inside and fix stuff when needed.
Agreed. My old Pismo was way easier to get into that my MacBook's
(pro or otherwise)
> But on the positive side when considered from its potential for
> changing how
> we work, the Air starts looking almost StarTrekkian.
That seems to be more of what the Air is intended to do.
Not so much for what it IS; but for the "future" it presents to us.
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Thu Jan 17 09:56:10 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 17 2008 - 12:30:01 EST