On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Ken Whitcomb <ken@imageguild.com> wrote:
> It is my understanding that this layout was created to intentionally
> slow down typists finger movements because it was possible to to type
> so fast that the mechanical arms could not retreat out of the path of
> the next arm without having them hit each other. Solve one problem,
> create another! Not that the mechanics that created manual typewriters
> could have seen the advent of electric typewriters let alone computers
> with keyboards.
>
It is also worth pointing out, that your average person, with a
smattering of touch-typing training/experience, can type 50-60 wpm,
which also seems to be about as fast as the average person can think
and type at the same time. ;-) So, combining those two features, we
are 'stuck' in a "good-enough" situation that doesn't really warrant
fixing. I'm perfectly happy with my typing speed (generally 60 wpm)
when thinking. On those rare occasions when I am transcribing, I could
wish I could type faster, but generally, my typing speed is sufficient
for me, so QWERTY or QWERTZ (Polish), works just fine.
-- -Jon Glass Krakow, Poland <jonglass@usa.net> "I don't believe in philosophies. I believe in fundamentals." --Jack Nicklaus ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Mon Feb 2 11:18:40 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 02 2009 - 12:30:01 EST