~~~ On 2009/01/04 21:31, Scott Rogers at srogers@gmail.com wrote ~~~
> Wait, don't you need to do it all again to verify your results? ;)
Indeed he must, preferably more than once. And then it has to be confirmed
by peer review-- oh wait, on second thought, let's just take his word for
it.
Shalom.
Christian
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
łAny sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a Newton.˛
-- what Arthur C. Clarke meant
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1ZzpdPJ7Zr4
(With thanks to Chod Lang)
http://tinyurl.com/29y2dl
http://www.diyplanner.com/node/3942
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
Fight Spam. Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/
Get MUGged and love it: http://www.oxmug.org/
Join today: http://www.newtontalk.net/
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Sun Jan 4 17:12:41 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 04 2009 - 18:30:01 EST