Re: [NTLK] It {wa}s the Fix

Don't you think it would haver more meaning if YOU were to replicate
his work.
Scientifically speaking that is.
:-)

Woody

On Jan 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Lord Groundhog wrote:

> ~~~ On 2009/01/04 21:31, Scott Rogers at srogers@gmail.com wrote ~~~
>
>> Wait, don't you need to do it all again to verify your results? ;)
>
> Indeed he must, preferably more than once. And then it has to be
> confirmed
> by peer review-- oh wait, on second thought, let's just take his
> word for
> it.
>
>
> Shalom.
> Christian

====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Sun Jan 4 17:34:34 2009