>Thanks for taking the time to say what I was trying to say with few
words,
in many.
> If Sculley were still at Apple's helm it would be far simpler, like
> you say, because there would no longer be any Apple to complain about.
> He drove it into the ground, but doofus Amelio didn't have the
> wherewithal to finish the job (altho he certainly tried)!
-----Original Message-----
From: MD Sforza
Ummm... Your initial comment stated how Sculley and Amelio nearly
destroyed
Apple. I felt it necessary to point out this is the same Sculley who is
described as "the driving force" behind the Newton concept which was
described by many as "his pet project".
To discard his involvement with such nonchalance is historically unfair.
However I admit that my initial reply was a knee-jerk Sculley vs. Jobs
reaction. My bad.... .
====================================================================
I wouldn't apologize. The initial message did come across as a
Sculley bashing message.
-----------------------------------------
====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Tue Jul 14 08:51:59 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 14 2009 - 09:30:00 EDT