[NTLK] h*cks, kr*ks, SN
Jim Lee
jimlee at centurytel.net
Mon Jan 18 14:38:24 EST 2010
Thank you for that post - very appropriate material for MLK Jr.'s
birthday today.
It was not my intent to insinuate that civil disobedience should
necessarily be applied to copyright law - I was merely pointing out
one way that the law can, and sometimes should, be superseded by the
people.
-Jim
On Jan 18, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Lord Groundhog wrote:
>
>
> Yes, sometimes the law needs to be opposed outright. But that isn't
> something to be done lightly. And as a veteran of the civil rights
> movement
> and the 1960s peace movement, I'm glad to hear you include the
> responsibility of the person carrying out civil disobedience to take
> the
> consequences for his/her actions. But as was made clear to us by
> people
> like Martin Luther King, civil disobedience ought to be reserved for
> when
> existing laws result in genuinely significant breaches of natural
> justice
> and moral decency.
[snip]
More information about the NewtonTalk
mailing list