[NTLK] 2010 thanks and a quick question...
lordgroundhog at gmail.com
Mon Mar 15 13:32:58 EDT 2010
~~~ On 2010/03/14 03:44, Jack Jenkins at jackmjenkins at gmail.com wrote ~~~
> It wasn't you, it was my unclear writing (I, too, blame Saturdays). I meant
> that I wrote a paper in RESPONSE to the article. Basically, I used the
> article as a real-world example of the debate between Clifford Geertz and Tala
> Asad about what "defines" religion.
> In short, I called the article problematic It was coincidental (seriously, I
> promise) that I had just acquired a Newton a week before reading the article.
> I only saw the article because a guy sitting in front of me during lecture was
> reading it on his laptop. I leaned over, asked what it was about, and proudly
> showed him my MP 130. He was weirded out for a second, and then, naturally,
> was spellbound by the handwriting recognition.
> Anyway, I was just curious as to what you all thought about the ORIGINAL
> Thanks for asking!
> - Jack
I've got that article knocking around on a drive -- it happens to be a topic
of interest to me so I grabbed it as soon as I saw it. I may even have some
notes I made at the time in response. I'll refresh my memory, and see if I
can say something sensible about it. We can hope. ;-)
Now excuse me, I have to top up the incense burner in front of my Newtons...
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
³Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a Newton.²
-- what Arthur C. Clarke meant
(With thanks to Chod Lang)
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
Fight Spam. Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/
Get MUGged and love it: http://www.oxmug.org/
Join today: http://www.newtontalk.net/
More information about the NewtonTalk