[NTLK] Newton USB Dongle
Matthias Melcher
mm at matthiasm.com
Mon Feb 6 07:19:41 EST 2017
I have a few internal modem connectors still here. If the demand is big enough, we can have more made by JAE. The minimum order is 300. This is btw how I got mine in the first place. The external connector can no longer be ordered though.
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:26 AM, Sonny Hung <sonnyhung at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Can I suggest someone check back into the archives.
> I know there was another user on the list who had a decent stash of the NIC
> connecters.
> They were selling them back awhile but I didn't need any myself and of
> course back then his price was a bit more than I wanted to pay per piece.
> Does anyone recall the individual? They were selling other Newton stuff
> back then. Hopefully this might help which ever direction this discussion
> is headed towards. Still lurking around. HTH
>
> God bless,
>
> Sonny Hung
> the Hung Family
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Jeff Sheldon <jeffsheldon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Really cool about the wifi module. I'll look it over in more detail in the
>> morning.
>>
>> In this post-wired world, it seems like network is ideal for syncs and
>> package installs. Do we have a serial over TCP/IP solution yet? I think
>> of socat under Linux as an example of a similar beast.
>>
>> USB-C seems like a good solution for power and data, but I haven't looked
>> at the specs yet.
>>
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 2017, at 15:30, Jake Bordens <jake at allaboutjake.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeff, the design is open for non-commercial use..
>> http://retronewton.blogspot.com or https://github.com/jake-b/
>> Newton-Internal-WiFi
>>>
>>> The board’s dimensions and fit are from trial and error, and probably
>> not perfect, but they work for a wifi card.. You don’t need the internal
>> screw because there aren’t any external mechanical stresses on the board.
>>>
>>> The module I chose because of its PPPD functionality, but an ESP8266 or
>> ESP32 would probably work with a SLIP or PPPD stack (I’m not sure if
>> something like that exists, or if it would need to be written).. An ESP
>> module would be better because the ConnectOne module is under encryption
>> export protection for some reason I don’t understand.
>>>
>>> I am not sure about USB-C either. You’d definitely need some
>> device-side circuitry to negotiate and request the 12v power supply. I’m
>> sure it’ll eventually be available in a commodity part.
>>>
>>> Given the two serial channels on the internal connector, would be
>> possible to do a dual WiFi/USB card, for sure. I also know Matthias was
>> working on something ESP8266 based too.
>>>
>>> Jake
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/5/17, 4:21 PM, "newtontalk-bounces at newtontalk.net on behalf of
>> Jeff Sheldon" <newtontalk-bounces at newtontalk.net on behalf of
>> jeffsheldon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Tony,
>>>
>>>
>>> It’s probably pretty likely that a USB to RS422 mini-din8 doesn’t
>> exist,
>>> but it’s likely that two compatible ends can be sourced based on a
>> quick
>>> Amazon search. I’ll go ahead and build one just a as a
>> proof-of-concept.
>>> I’m happy to see many solutions for USB-to-RS232 FTDI (cut wire)
>> cables out
>>> there presenting a variety of options.
>>>
>>>
>>> One issue I recall with the SER-001 was that people said it would
>> cause
>>> slight deformation to the case and even cracking because the PCB was
>> thick
>>> and pressed up against the case. I’m glad to see thinner PCBs readily
>>> available from DIY shops like OSH Park.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jake,
>>>
>>>
>>> I read about the WIFI board a while back, but memory escapes me—is
>> that
>>> your design? Very cool. the ESP chips are so amazingly dynamic and
>> cheap
>>> that I can easily see that being a good solution for a variety of
>> needs.
>>> USB-C is definitely forward-thinking…I don’t have anything that can
>> talk to
>>> it, but I think it’s worth pursuing for the long haul.
>>>
>>>
>>> There was some talk on here last spring about using cheap, highly
>> flexible,
>>> chips to expand Newton functionality in various ways (from the
>> internal
>>> port) other than for just network or sync. Do you recall the width
>> of the
>>> PCB on your design and do you have some photos of the product
>> online? Is
>>> this a closed design?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dennis, thanks for that. Yes, “unscrupulous”. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Does your SER-001 fit well or do you have that issue I was mentioning
>> with
>>> case fitment and pressure being applied by the thick PCB?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ve, too, have occasionally found the interconnect plug/sockets, but
>> yes,
>>> it’s amazingly difficult and they tend to no longer be available.
>> I’ll
>>> look into seeing if a new connector board can be made to sit on top
>> of the
>>> old pads and still use the existing case footprint. If I recall
>> correctly,
>>> I think even the original iPod/Pad/Phone connector had some
>> compatible pins
>>> for basic things which could be “corrected” as-needed with the minimal
>>> circuitry.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven’t checked on this in a while, but do we have a centralized
>> wiki or
>>> somesuch for active community projects and/or needs? It might be
>> nice to
>>> have a list of “must-haves” with people assigned to them (as
>> interested or
>>> testers if nothing more) and some documentation to go with those
>> ideas. My
>>> frustration since 1994 has been that many of the expansion solutions
>> that
>>> have turned up are closed and limited in availability. I’d love to
>> have
>>> some open projects which anyone can build and with a few alternatives
>> for
>>> parts should one supplier disappear. Might be nice to have a
>>> compatibility database for PCMCIA and CF cards, a list of expansion
>> units
>>> and software projects along with the developer(s) behind it, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Unrelated, I’m only now just finding this nice WIRED article
>> featuring some
>>> of our longstanding Newton heroes (and I tweeted a photo of that same
>> case
>>> a couple weeks ago):
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.wired.com/2013/08/the-newton-lives/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Jeff
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:17 PM, David Arnold <davida at pobox.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jeff,
>>>>
>>>> I’ve been trying (unsuccessfully, so far) to source the JAE interconnect
>>>> plugs and do a small run of adaptors. I’ve got a MiniDIN8 prototype
>> which
>>>> works with the Interconnect dongle, but I was hoping to eliminate the
>> need
>>>> for the dongle.
>>>>
>>>> Given I’ve been unable to get the Interconnect plugs as surplus, I
>>>> considered getting a batch made. But given there seems to be perhaps a
>>>> market for about 50 such adaptors all up, the costs don’t work out.
>>>>
>>>> I’ve got 5 Interconnect plugs (plus an un-potted Interconnect adaptor)
>>>> that Newton Inc sent me while they existed, but otherwise I guess a
>>>> MiniDIN8 would be the next best thing?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> d
>>>>
>>>>> On 6 Feb 2017, at 05:14, Jeff Sheldon <jeffsheldon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've had problems with the Prolific chipset in many applications. IMHO,
>>>> it's a cheap product cloned the world over and the drivers aren't well
>>>> maintained. FTDI is the way to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adriano is scrupulous. 11 years ago, he privately pushed me to provide
>>>> details on adapters I was creating for the community to interface with
>> iPod
>>>> devices and a homebrew keyboard using the internal port. He even wanted
>> me
>>>> to store my progress on his personal storage space. When I resisted, he
>>>> backed down and suggested I contact Daniel Padilla to help with the
>>>> software side. After some back-and-forth, Daniel stopped responding. It
>>>> seemed strange. Unexpectedly, Adriano and Daniel released new products
>>>> based on the idea, though far less capable. It watered down the idea
>> and I
>>>> shelved my Newton, then dropped off the list for some time, also hiving
>> up
>>>> on my 2100 PCB mapping project (for the sake of creating minimized
>> designs).
>>>>>
>>>>> If the community needs a USB solution, what would be the preference?
>>>> Internal card with port, Interconnect to USB end, or RS422 to USB? Seems
>>>> like the last--which people are talking about here--is the easiest and
>>>> cheapest solution. All three are doable, though those JAE ports are
>> hard to
>>>> find.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 5, 2017, at 06:47, Jake Bordens <jake at allaboutjake.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I recently purchased a FDTI serial cable for use in Mac OS Sierra and
>>>> it worked without drivers.. I had a prolific-chipset cable but the
>> driver
>>>> was causing my machine to crash, so I decided to get the FDTI since it
>> was
>>>> more compatible, and apparently did not need drivers (though I do a lot
>> of
>>>> tinkering so its possible I had a driver installed for another device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I find it suspicious that it doesn’t show up as a USB device with a
>>>> PID/VID in the profiler… that would indicate that it isn’t even showing
>> up
>>>> on the USB bus. However silly, maybe try a different USB cable,
>> sometimes
>>>> cheap USB cables are charge-only. I’ve gotten bitten by that before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Side note, I would like to acquire one of these “Adriano” dongles, if
>>>> anyone has a stash of them and is willing to part with one. Would make
>>>> development a little easier. My guess is that they are rare, and folks
>>>> don’t want to part with them, and for that I’d understand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://newtontalk.net/
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> http://newtontalk.net/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> http://newtontalk.net/
>>>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Jeff
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>>
>>> http://newtontalk.net/
>>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> http://newtontalk.net/
>>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> http://newtontalk.net/
>> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://newtontalk.net/
> http://twitter.com/newtontalk
More information about the NewtonTalk
mailing list