Well I am glad someone understood what I was trying to convey!
on 08/06/2000 03:00 AM, Khaled Tewfik at khaledt@earthlink.net wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2000 Oz Suguitan wrote:
>
> -----------
>> So by your arguments and implied opinion it would be true to say that
>> since Apple didn't have primary design in the G3 processor, and are
>> buying those processors from IBM and Motorola, Apple's Macs are now
>> really IBM's and Motorola's computers.
> -----------
> People, come on, hold off your flames and give the guy a break, you are
> jumping on every word he is saying. He miscommunicated him self and he admited
> it. But is not it obvious that English is hot his first language. English is
> not my first language and I hate it when people pick on my gramatical or
> linguistic errors.
>
> In reference to the above quote, I believe he made his arguments in response
> to another post that argued that Apple did not innovate OS X since the core
> technology (next and UNIX) is not Apple's. So in effect he was defending
> Apple.
>
> I hope I won't be placed against a wall and shot for trying to ease the
> attacks on whom apears to be a public enemy of this list.
>
> (BTW, I am not in any way related to the person in question, I do not even
> recall the correct spelling of his name go I am retiring to him as "person")
> --- don't hurt me ;)
> Dr. Khaled Tewfik
> ================
***************************************
NewtonTalk brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM -- the ESPN of politics on the Internet! All the players, all the news, and the hottest analysis and features (plus 'toons!) anywhere.... visit http://www.evote.com today!
***************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe info?
Visit the NewtonTalk section at http://www.planetnewton.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 01 2000 - 00:00:11 CDT