Re: [NTLK] PDF reader Poll status

From: Paul Guyot (pguyot_at_kallisys.net)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 11:01:04 EDT


> > Desktop solutions means much more work because there are plenty of
>> desktop platforms. Frankly, if I had to code that, I would choose
>> Newton-only because it represents much less work.
>
>Will this be coded for NOS 1.x, 2.0, or 2.1??? Or different versions for
>different Newts (based on screen size)? Anyway, just trying to point out
>that there's plenty of potential for work even in a Newt-only solution.

Er, sorry to ask such a dumb question, but do books created with
NewtonPress work on NOS 1.x?
Anyway, C++ tools are only for NOS 2.x and you don't need NOS 2.1
APIs here (except to show grays graphics), so a Newt-only solution
can only be envisage for NOS 2.x devices.

Paul

-- 
Home page: http://www.kallisys.com/
Newton-powered WebServer: http://newt.dyndns.org:8080/

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:32 EDT