For me I switched to an eMate because of sight considerations. I was
just having too much difficulty seeing the MP screen, and I'm not quite
ready for glasses yet. I see the eMate screen just fine. I do like to
type also, but the MP & eMate both recognized by printing amazingly
well. We started out with MPs for all our employees in our business, but
once I started using the eMate most of them have switched over to it.
The two that are still using MPs couldn't deal with the speed
difference. That seems to be a distinct personal preference.
Merrrry "Christ"mas to all,
Glenn Roe
Kevin LaCombe wrote:
>
> Definately two different newtons. I find myself using my 2100 on a daily
> basis and my emate when I anticipate needing the keyboard for an extended
> period. Plus the cool factor. The emate became so much more useful after
> getting the upgrade. Just not enough internal store without it. If I had
> to choose between them, I would go with the 2100 (faster, 2 slots, cheaper
> considering the cost of the emate upgrade). Plus, there are a ton on ebay
> now.
>
> --
> This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
> To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
> mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 02 2002 - 12:02:03 EST