At 09:16 PM 10/30/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>You would need a real fast processor and a ton of memory to be comfortable.
>And you would need to make it upgradeable because on the day you would
>introduce it, you would already be lagging a couple of versions behind...
Not true on either case. Look at J2ME. Hell, the KVM is butt-fast on a
Palm V... Nice thing about a JVM is scalability... Now, granted, the JVM
isn't *quite* ready for the handheld space (that's just IMHO) but in
another year I think *that* part of Java will come into it's own.
In the meantime I'm getting plenty of work as a Java expert... ;-)
>And don't forget that Micro$oft is trying as much as it can to kill it. For
>instance, XP was released recently without any JRE. Micro$oft wants to
>replace Java with C# (pronounced C-Sharp), which would run only on Windows
>platforms...
And it will never succeed for all it effort. Poor guys.. they really are
pretty damn stupid when it comes to anything Enterprise-level software.
>Will they succeed? Well, who knows? There are so many lemmings in the
>corporate US that I wouldn't be surprised if they were able to kill it...
Guess again. Try doing a Job search sometime for software engineers. The
most are still C++, then Java, and *then* VB/VBA/Access. Some analyst
groups think that Java will overtake C++ in job demand within two years.
MS just wants their share of that developer market. Good luck, since I'll
never use D-flat or J-Dull, ever....
-- David Orriss Jr. dave_at_davenet.net http://www.davenet.net ICQ UIN: XXXXXX (please ask if you want to talk via ICQ) Linux - Chicken Soup for the Unix Soul-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:58 EST