Actually, while I can't argue with you about whether Outlook SUCKS or not, I
can show you how to solve that particular problem- I'm running Outlook 2000,
but I'd be surprised if they've broken this in the new version-
Try building the rule like this-
Choose the "With specific words in the messge header" rule, and fill in
"X-list: newtontalk". That's it.
Good luck,
-Sam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Mays [mailto:chaosmonk_at_earthlink.net]
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:33 AM
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] (No Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:34:09 -0500
>
>
>
> To be perfectly honest, Outlook SUCKS. I've been using it
> for some time
> now, and ever since I signed up for the list and applied
> filters to move
> all the NTLK messages to my NewtonTalk folder, it likes to
> only transfer
> them maybe 1/3 of the time...the rest of the time it
> nonchalantly leaves
> them all sitting in my Inbox for me to deal with. Not only
> that, but a
> bunch of these messages I've been getting have had a completely blank
> subject line. I'm getting rid of Outlook 2002 NOW. Argh.
> Those of you
> who are using it... I pity you. Use something else. :(
>
>
> Michael Mays
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net
> [mailto:newtontalk-bounce_at_newtontalk.net] On Behalf Of Eric L. Strobel
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 4:19 AM
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject:
>
>
> on 4/26/02 2:59 AM, Jon Glass at jonglass_at_mac.com wrote:
>
> >
> > on 4/26/02 3:54 AM, Eric L. Strobel at fyzycyst_at_comcast.net wrote:
> >
> >> I believe the gripe is that it would be nice to order the entire
> threads by
> >> date, not just w/in each thread.
> >
> > I can think of one good reason to have the threads listed
> by subject.
> If
> > they are sorted by subject, the same threads are usually in
> about the
> same
> > place in the folder view. In other words, the audio adapter is at or
> about
> > the top, and the palm threads are somewhere in the middle or toward
> the
> > bottom. I can follow threads pretty quickly because they
> are sorted by
> > topic, and not by the date of the first message in a thread (which
> could get
> > rather anarchic, now that I think of it. I have no problems with
> sorting by
> > subject to get threaded. I will give Victor credit, in that
> NewtonTalk
> is
> > the best email list (to which I'm subscribed) for its threads
> together.
> > Other lists somehow have the same thread split up in several places,
> yet
> > NewtonTalk keeps them together quite well. Do you put
> something in the
> > header that helps Entourage and OE to keep them together?
>
> It is largely (my opinion) that the "[NTLK]" comes AFTER the "Re:" in
> replies. This allows the original subject "[NTLK] blah blah blah" to
> remain
> invariant, thereby allowing OE/Entourage to establish that a swatch of
> messages are all part of the same thread.
>
> - Eric.
>
> --
>
> Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)
>
> =====================================================================
> Design is an iterative process. The necessary number of iterations is
> one more than the number you have currently done. This is true at any
> point in time.
> =====================================================================
>
>
> --
> Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
>
>
> --
> Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
>
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun May 05 2002 - 14:05:11 EDT