on 3/7/02 12:54 AM, Chris Chapman at pan1k_at_earthlink.net wrote:
>
> Polo's are more expensive, of course. I've gone this route before. Polos
> look best when they are embroidered, and *that* is expensive.
>
> -Chris
> On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 09:40 PM, Jon Glass wrote:
>
>>
>> on 3/6/02 7:03 PM, Jim Anderson at jiman_at_microsoft.com wrote:
>>
>>> Man, you people are *such* geeks.
>>>
>>> Count me in, by the way... ;-)
>>
>> What's wrong with a polo shirt, or rugby shirt, maybe? (I don't do
>> tees...)
>> --
>> Jon Glass
>> Krakow, Poland
>> <jonglass_at_usa.net>
>>
>> "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of
>> chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! - I know not what course
>> others
>> may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
>> - Patrick Henry
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Have you checked the FAQ lately? http://www.guns-
>> media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
>> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
>> To unsubscribe/manage: visit the above link. Questions:
>> victor_at_newtontalk.net
>>
>
Hey like I said my shop does emroidery and I can probably get polos
emroidered from $10 a piece.
Josh
-- Have you checked the FAQ lately? http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe/manage: visit the above link. Questions: victor_at_newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:20 EST