On Friday, November 29, 2002 4:31 PM,
Chris Lepine <c.lepine_at_shaw.ca> wrote:
> 1. The Newton is not very reliable if the amount of problems listed in
here
> (and elsewhere) is used as a sample group. I've never seen a machine with
> so many hardware related failures. Nobody should have to "buy two" in case
> one fails. While I understand it is relatively archaic as far as hardware
> is concerned, even my old console systems from the early 80's still
operate
> flawlessly.
>
Complete unfounded. I've owned almost every popular PDA Platform that has
come out since 1992. The MP2100 is *by far* the most solid and reliable.
As for your other comments, yea we get a bit sidetracked here, but with the
best of intentions. I think if you spent a bit more time here you'd find
this to be a very supportive community.
-- David Orriss Jr. dave_at_davenet.net http://www.davenet.net http://www.codeskanks.comPlease email me if you want my ICQ/AIM/IM ID's.
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:03:57 EST