Re: [NTLK] Emate redux?

From: Karel Jansens (kareljansens_at_tiscalinet.be)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 13:19:12 PDT


On Thursday 03 July 2003 16:54, Brian Pearce wrote:
> > It's a freakin' *Palm* , fergossakes!!!
>
> Why is that, by definition, a bad thing? It's a rugged device that's
> been designed (primarily for a specific market) to do one thing well.
> In many ways, it's the logical next step the Emate might have taken;
> lower cost, more durable (the smaller screen is probably less prone to
> damage), and it does the few tasks that it needs to do well. (Licensing
> the Palm OS for the device was probably less expensive than building
> one from the ground up.) Not a bad idea by any means.

Hey, a Palm is not too bad as an electronic version of the Success Agenda.
That doesn't mean it'll be any good at trying to be a real computer...

:), sort of.

-- 
Karel Jansens.
Don't send me HTML-based e-mails, my mail program is set up to ignore them.
If you don't know what this means, ask someone or get off the Internet.
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 16:00:00 PDT