Re: [NTLK] Special treatment for newbies?

From: Jon Glass (jonglass_at_usa.net)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 02:01:08 PST

Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Spam Arrest Verification for List Posting"
Previous message: Andrew Maier: "Re: [NTLK] Spam Arrest Verification for List Posting"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Special treatment for newbies?"
Next in thread: L A GREEN: "Re: [NTLK] Special treatment for newbies?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 3/24/03 9:59 PM, Eric L. Strobel at fyzycyst_at_comcast.net wrote:

> Just a thought. I'm not sure anything really needs to be done, since the
> most oft-repeated newbie questions are answered so quickly that they real=
ly
> don't influence the overall content of the list much.

Yeah. I suppose we waste more bandwidth talking about Noutine Poutine=81 than
answering newbie questions=AE. ;-)
--=20
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<mailto:jonglass_at_usa.net>

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murder=
s
itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." --Joh=
n
Adams

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Spam Arrest Verification for List Posting"
Previous message: Andrew Maier: "Re: [NTLK] Spam Arrest Verification for List Posting"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Special treatment for newbies?"
Next in thread: L A GREEN: "Re: [NTLK] Special treatment for newbies?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 25 2003 - 03:30:01 PST