From: Laurent Daudelin (laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 15:17:04 PDT
> From: "Ed Kummel" <tech_ed_at_yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: [NTLK] [OT] reverse technology
>
> You know. I see things like this and it saddens me:
> http://www.ExIdeas.com
> This is exactly what I mean when I say that nobody is
> willing to think beyond the standard. Here is yet
> another keyboard configuration. I applaud the thought
> and design that went into this, but I am saddened that
> this ammount of effort went into yet another keyboard
> implementation!
> Had the same thought and consideration (3 years of
> study and research by no fewer than 2 seperate
> universities and this particular company) who knows
> what kind of input device would have been developed!
> When I see things like this masquerading as
> innovation, it sometimes makes me feel that technology
> has let me down...
> When I think of innovative technology, I want
> something that I would have never thought of.
> Something like this:
> http://www.io2technology.com/
> Now, if this ever makes it, it will be unbelievable!
Wow! I agree that this is really awesome if it ever gets in production. I'm
wondering what would be the cost, though...
-Laurent.
-- =========================================================================== Laurent Daudelin Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com Washington, DC, USA ************************* Usual disclaimers apply ************************* -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 13:30:01 PDT