Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips...

From: ccsccs7 (ccsccs7_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Jun 08 2005 - 21:40:19 PDT

• Next message: Matt Baker: "Re: [NTLK] [OT]Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Previous message: Toby Hutton: "Re: [NTLK] [OT]Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• In reply to: Toby Hutton: "Re: [NTLK] Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Next in thread: Konstantinos Theofilis: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Rosetta sounds a bit intriguing. For the longest time,
PowerPC emulation didn't exist until only recently.
Hmm…

I'd feel a lot better if Rosetta worked both ways, not
only translating PowerPC code to Intel, but Intel to
PowerPC. That would more or less calm some fears, I
think.

CC

--- Toby Hutton <tobyhutton_at_mac.com> wrote:

> On Jun 08 '05, Sean Cross wrote:…
> You take offense to the Rosetta Stone reference?
> It's fairly unsubtle
> but not a bad name for what it does.
> …

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

• Next message: Matt Baker: "Re: [NTLK] [OT]Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Previous message: Toby Hutton: "Re: [NTLK] [OT]Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• In reply to: Toby Hutton: "Re: [NTLK] Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Next in thread: Konstantinos Theofilis: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] Concerning Apple's Switch to Intel Chips..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 08 2005 - 22:00:00 PDT