From: Sushi (sushi_at_ragingbull.com)
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 01:53:48 PST
Hi All,
I think that Robert hit the nail on the head.
The foundation (basics) are what is important. If you have a good
foundation, you can build what you want from there.
The Newton has the best interface that I have used. The HWR is very
good. The interface is intuitive and easily to add features. The Newt
feels like a part of me, not something that I must battle to do what I
want it to do (for the most part) unlike Palm and Pocket PC solutions.
Sure the new Palm and Pocket PC hardware is nice. But they lack what
gives the Newt its charm.
Well, back to lurking.
Sushi
> On Mar 14, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Robert Benschop wrote:
>
> I don't think the number of features would be the problem,
> everybody likes a Swiss Army Knife. The problem is that
> since the Newton nobody seems to realize what a Swiss
> Army Knife is anymore.
>
> So get the basics right (good interface, HWR, the works)
> and you can ad whatever you want.
>
> Who would object to a Newton that could do everything? I
> wouldn't.
>
> Which is why I think Einstein has potential, nobody else
> seems to 'get it'.
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 14 2005 - 03:00:02 PST