Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Patch 71J059 - Year 2010 Fix

I always thought of an eMate as a slow 2100 rather than a slow 2000, since my eMate always seems to have more heap avail than my 2000. I think the Wikipedia page bears that out.

--
_sc
-----Original Message-----
From: Woody Smith <woodysmith@comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 10:35 PM
To: newtontalk@newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] [ANN] Patch 71J059 - Year 2010 Fix
should be about the same.  each are rated to have 1M system RAM.
but my emate reports 900K installed system RAM
Woody
On Jun 1, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Lawrence wrote:
>>> This time I froze all but the built-in applications, and removed  
>>> the 32MB
> linear
> flash memory card.
> I wonder, will us eMate users - when the eMate version of the patch is
> eventually released - have to do something similar?  If memory is  
> tight on a
> 2000, I imagine things will be even tighter on an eMate.
>
> Just curious.  Glad to hear everything's working out.
>
> dave
==================================================================== 
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ     - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary         - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt                - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
==================================================================== 
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ     - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary         - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt                - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================