Re: [NTLK] More on law

From: Templarsog1_at_aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 15:30:18 EDT

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] OT: Copyrights, Abandonware and such..."
Previous message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] PDF reader status (Waba)"
Maybe in reply to: eric engle: "[NTLK] More on law"
Next in thread: Thomas Cherry: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Reply: Thomas Cherry: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 9/7/01 3:28:55 PM, fyzycyst_at_home.com writes:

<< So, I guess you're going to see to it that the producers of the movie "O"
get prosecuted for so egregiously using the fruits of the Bard's labor??
(for those that don't know, the movie is based on the plot of Othello)

- Eric. >>

If there was a mechanism to compensate Shakespeares descendants it should be
done. Although I do not think they would lend their name to such prattle.
William

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] OT: Copyrights, Abandonware and such..."
Previous message: Steve Weyer: "Re: [NTLK] PDF reader status (Waba)"
Maybe in reply to: eric engle: "[NTLK] More on law"
Next in thread: Thomas Cherry: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Reply: Thomas Cherry: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:35 EDT