[NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?

From: Polenta Marco (Marco.Polenta_at_eurac.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 12:40:59 EDT

Next message: John Goggan: "[NTLK] "preliminaryCharge" status?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] extras button bar?"
Next in thread: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Seth Hurwitz: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I've found this article... give it a look...

http://www.business2.com/articles/mag/0,1640,40364,FF.html

Marco

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: John Goggan: "[NTLK] "preliminaryCharge" status?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] extras button bar?"
Next in thread: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Chris Searles: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: IMNewtMan_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Seth Hurwitz: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Polenta Marco: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Oliver Brose: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Maybe reply: Lee, Christopher J: "Re: [NTLK] The OQO should have been the new Newton?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:01:42 EDT