[NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention

From: Joel M. Sciamma (joel_at_inventors-emporium.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 19 2003 - 02:49:47 PST

• Next message: [+|-]: "[NTLK] Dumb Newton"
• Previous message: Eckhart Köppen: "Re: [NTLK] Newton ROMs"
• Next in thread: Darius Zendeh: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Reply: Darius Zendeh: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Reply: Joost van de Griek: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I came across this snippet about a chap who has retired his 2100 for a
Tungsten:

http://mrbarrett.com/

Having now played with a Tungsten, the sync issue can be the only appeal -
the HW is like a bar of soap to pick up and the sliding door is just silly.

Battery life has taken a serious hit to power what is a nice, but
essentially superflous colour display.

Joel.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: [+|-]: "[NTLK] Dumb Newton"
• Previous message: Eckhart Köppen: "Re: [NTLK] Newton ROMs"
• Next in thread: Darius Zendeh: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Reply: Darius Zendeh: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Reply: Joost van de Griek: "Re: [NTLK] Newton vs Tungsten mention"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 19 2003 - 04:00:01 PST