Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Sun Oct 03 2004 - 12:05:22 PDT

Next message: Raj Patel: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
In reply to: Jim Witte: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
Next in thread: Sunder: "[NTLK] Value VS Worth (was Re: einstein -> antelope -> oqo?)"
Reply: Sunder: "[NTLK] Value VS Worth (was Re: einstein -> antelope -> oqo?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Oct 3, 2004, at 11:27 AM, Jim Witte wrote:

> I think the OQO would be nice - overkill is never a bad think IMO,

You remind me of a joke we used to tell about LISP programmers...

They know the value of everything and the cost of nothing.

Marty

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Raj Patel: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
In reply to: Jim Witte: "Re: [NTLK] einstein -> antelope -> oqo? RANT ALERT!"
Next in thread: Sunder: "[NTLK] Value VS Worth (was Re: einstein -> antelope -> oqo?)"
Reply: Sunder: "[NTLK] Value VS Worth (was Re: einstein -> antelope -> oqo?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 03 2004 - 15:30:01 PDT